The race is on to create an economic engine for the early 21st century that
matches information technology's contribution to the late 20th. Some of the
smart money is betting on the emerging field of "life sciences" -
biotechnology, medicine and related studies of living things.
The race is also on to be a geographic focal point of that movement, which is
likely to transform medicine and much else, probably for the better. But can
there be a Silicon Valley of life sciences?
The lessons of the valley's rise, including a culture of entrepreneurism and
close ties between academia and business, have not been lost on the rest of the
world.
Other regions may never match the valley's prominence in information technology,
but leadership in the new era may well be up for grabs - even though no single
region is likely to have the dominance the valley enjoyed for so long.
The possibility of being a contender is enough. It's why Michigan, the capital
of what once was derisively called the "Rust Belt," is spending big
money to create a "Life Sciences Corridor," spanning research
institutions from Grand Rapids to Detroit.
The project has won funding from an unusual source - a portion of the state's
share of the lawsuit settlement with the tobacco industry. A Republican governor
and legislature allocated $50 million a year for 20 years to the life-sciences
corridor.
"No other state is doing this," said Lee Bollinger, president of the
University of Michigan, who helped persuade state leaders to invest the tobacco
money so creatively.
Bollinger's own institution expects to invest about $700 million in the next few
years to create a Life Sciences Institute and related programs. A key aim of the
project is to commercialize the discoveries to help create and nurture thriving
businesses in the state.
Maybe no other state is using the blood money from the tobacco settlement for
such purposes, but other states are seeing a pot of gold in life sciences and
investing accordingly. In California and the Bay Area, for example, major
research universities such as Stanford, the University of California-Berkeley
and the University of California-San Francisco have all launched life-sciences
initiatives or are expanding current ones.
They have some built-in advantages, including the presence of many homegrown biotech
companies - plus the technology industries and enterpreneurial fervor that
spawned Silicon Valley's recent booms. Life-science research relies to a
staggering degree on the collecting, massaging and sharing of information. In
some respects, it's as much about computers as biology.
The Boston area has many of those same advantages. So do research centers in
other parts of the United States and around the world.
Michigan's academic and political leaders are aware of the state's drawbacks,
notably its citizens' longstanding aversion to business risk-taking - a far cry
from the state's status in the early part of the 20th century, when Michigan was
an entrepreneurial hotbed that seeded the automobile industry. As the Detroit
News reported recently, Michigan has been the birthplace of useful biotech-related
inventions that ultimately were commercialized elsewhere.
That's not a new phenomenon, either. Some of the technology and infrastructure
that became the modern Internet started in Michigan. You'd never know that based
on what happened afterward.
But the state's leaders think they're on the right track this time. They think
they can help shift attitudes if they create the right conditions.
Great centers of bio-medicine will only exist "where there is substantial
commercial activity," said Bollinger. But commercial activity "comes
where the great science is."
Michigan has at least one advantage that the coasts can't match. The state
boasts a dramatically lower cost of living, plus a lifestyle that many people
find more appealing than what they encounter on the coasts or in big cities. Ann
Arbor, where I spent a year in the 1980s on a fellowship at the university,
combines small-city charms with the cultural advantages of an urban center.
A university is more than science. Liberal arts and values co-exist with
research and other ideas.
Encouragingly, Michigan's life-sciences project goes beyond research,
development and the spawning of an industry. Bollinger and his colleagues have
insisted that ethics and other academic disciplines be part of the mix.
"You do the basic science, but you have to integrate the humanities and
professional schools," he said.
"We missed that with physics," Bollinger said, referring in part to
the development of nuclear technology in an era when military and business
imperatives overwhelmed other considerations. "Let's not miss it this
time."
|
If you have come to this page from an outside location click here to get back to mindfully.org |