U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy

Panel Presses New Ocean Safeguards 

KENNETH R WEISS / LA Times 21apr04

[Read Executive Summary | Wall Street Journal article below]

 

A grim report urges the U.S. to take steps to save its ailing waters, including curbing pollution and checking development.

A commission authorized by Congress and appointed by President Bush has issued a gloomy report on America's oceans, urging the government to intervene in hundreds of ways — from curtailing pollution to controlling coastal development — in order to nurse the ailing waters back to health.

The 450-page report from the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy details what has gone wrong: seafood contaminated with bacteria and chemicals such as mercury and dioxins; urban runoff laden with oil, trash and human waste; farm runoff that causes blooms of algae that suffocate all life and create oceanic "dead zones"; and rising sea temperatures that are killing coral reefs and spreading water-borne viruses.

The report lays blame on a variety of human activities. It singles out commercial fishermen who deplete fish stocks and discard up to a quarter of their catch.

It also faults poorly planned coastal development that degrades estuaries and wetlands and puts people in the path of violent storms.

The report will please and provoke many of the groups that share an interest in the oceans, from conservationists and fishermen to the oil industry and the military.

It calls for weakening the authority of regional fishery management councils controlled by the fishing industry.

It also encourages new techniques of sea-floor mining and calls for relaxing restrictions on the use of industrial sonar, which can disturb whales and dolphins.

"Everyone agrees the oceans are in trouble," said commission Chairman James D. Watkins, a retired Navy admiral, referring to the 16 panel members, who included oil and shipping executives as well as scientists and government officials. "We know if we don't get moving now, in 10 years we may not be able to recover."

Watkins said the overwhelming evidence collected at public hearings and site visits made it easy for the commissioners to reach consensus on the urgency of their mission.

The report, the first comprehensive analysis of the oceans in 35 years, emphasizes their role in providing food and jobs, as well as their intangible benefits.

"We also love the oceans for their beauty and majesty and for their intrinsic power to relax, rejuvenate and inspire," the report says. "Unfortunately, we are starting to love our oceans to death." The report recommends that Bush set up a National Ocean Council, appoint a White House assistant to lead it, and bring order to the chaos of 20 federal agencies that implement 140 federal laws related to America's oceans.

In all, the commission came up with about 200 recommendations, with an estimated price tag of $3 billion, including a proposal to make sense of what Watkins calls "a byzantine patchwork of laws and regulations that don't really work."

James T. Connaughton, chairman of the White House Council on Environmental Quality, said he agreed with the "general diagnosis" and the need for action.

But he said the administration would hold off on its response until the report — technically a draft — was completed in the next few months.

California officials praised the report. "Protecting our ocean and coastal resources is a top priority" for Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and his administration, California Resources Secretary Mike Chrisman and Environmental Protection Agency Secretary Terry Tamminen said in a statement.

State officials plan to gather experts early next month for a meeting to consider how the report's recommendations should affect state policy.

Members of Congress, who have awaited the report since they ordered it in 2000, are already preparing legislation.

This week, the Senate Commerce and Appropriations committees will begin a series of hearings on the commission's findings.

In the House, the bipartisan Oceans Caucus plans to stitch the newly released recommendations into legislation it has been drafting since June, when the Pew Oceans Commission, a private panel funded by the Pew Charitable Trusts, issued similar findings.

"We are putting together the BOB — the Big Oceans Bill," said Rep. Sam Farr (D-Carmel), an Ocean Caucus co-chairman. "It will put together the recommendations of the Pew Commission with those from this commission."

Ocean advocates in Congress believe they will need Bush's backing. Some environmentalists worry the president will act on the least consequential recommendations of the report.

"My fear is that he would do the old lipstick-on-the-pig routine," said Roger T. Rufe Jr., president of the Ocean Conservancy. "Pick a few minor things in the report, call it his clean-oceans initiative and make it look like he's done something significant."

Commissioners noted that this was the first presidential panel to examine America's oceans since the Stratton Commission in 1969 made recommendations to Congress that led to the creation of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The Stratton Commission focused on foreign fishing fleets plundering the seas off U.S. shores, and set up ways for the U.S. fleet to expand and push the foreigners out. The system set up eight regional fishery management councils, which worked too well, the new commission said. The problem now is too many U.S. fishermen chasing too few fish.

The commission recommends reforming these regional councils, which are run by fishing industry representatives. The councils determine how many fish can be caught every year and decide which groups of fishermen are allowed to catch them.

The commission recommends stripping the councils of the power to decide how many fish can be caught and placing it in the hands of scientists appointed by federal regulators, who would presumably be insulated from industry pressure.

Under the commission's proposal, if a council failed to reduce the total catch by postponing action or rejecting scientific advice — a pattern blamed for the collapse of the cod fishery off New England and rockfish off California — the fishery would be shut down.

"Now the default for inaction is everything stays the same and fishermen keep on overfishing," said Commissioner Andrew A. Rosenberg, a former deputy director of the National Marine Fisheries Service. "The new default would be: No fishing."

The commission also recommends placing transponders on commercial vessels and using satellites as an enforcement tool to make sure boats are not fishing in closed areas.

William T. Hogarth, director of the National Marine Fisheries Service, said he supported expanding the use of satellites, which are used to track scallop fishermen that dredge the ocean bottom off New England.

But Hogarth isn't sure the administration will support stripping fishery management councils of their power to set catch limits. "I think the managers need some discretion," he said.

Many recommendations are similar to those issued by the Pew Oceans Commission, even though many of the Pew commissioners were drawn from conservation organizations whereas many of the U.S. commissioners worked in the oil, shipping and banking industries.

Leon E. Panetta, White House chief of staff under President Clinton who chaired the Pew commission, said policymakers in Washington should take note of the like-minded message. "We now have two commissions identifying the same problems in the ocean that need to be fixed," he said.

The presidential commission, however, didn't go as far as some members had hoped. It did not call for additional areas to be protected from fishing and mining. However, it suggested that such reserves would be useful in managing marine ecosystems, as opposed to the current policy of managing a species at time.

Nor did it address global overfishing, even though the United States imports about 80% of its seafood.

Commissioner William D. Ruckelshaus, who was the first chief of the Environmental Protection Agency, said the panel wanted to limit its recommendations to realistic, easily achievable results.

"We ought to get our own house in order before we start lecturing everybody else," Ruckelshaus said. "Once we do that, we will have a lot more influence internationally than we do now."

source: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-oceans21apr21,1,6535488.story 21apr04


U.S. Report Backs Major Policy Shift In Coasts, Oceans 

JIM CARLTON / Wall Street Journal 21apr04

A massive federal report on the state of the nation's coasts and oceans agrees with numerous private studies that they are in dire condition, and recommends drastic policy changes, including a doubling in the U.S.'s marine-research funds.

The preliminary findings released yesterday by the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy are significant in that they largely echo the results of another major private study of the oceans last year by the Pew Charitable Trusts. That study, headed by former Clinton administration Chief of Staff Leon Panetta, had been blasted by some conservative lawmakers as biased toward liberal environmental interests.

The federal commission was appointed by President Bush after the Republican-led Congress in 2000 authorized the first comprehensive look at the nation's coastal and ocean waters since a similar report in 1969 led to creation of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Like the Pew report, the Bush administration's panel recommends overhauling the fragmented approach to current marine policy to better focus regulatory efforts. For example, U.S. marine-related policies are overseen by as many as a dozen federal agencies and 60 legislative committees. The Bush panel also recommends a special assistant to the president be named to oversee oceanic efforts. The Pew panel had recommended the establishment of a whole new department -- a possibility the federal commissioners also said should be considered, but after other measures are taken.

"For this commission to identify very similar problems as the Pew commission adds a lot of credence to the plight of the oceans," said Lee Crockett, executive director of the Marine Fish Conservation Network, a national coalition of fishing, recreation and environmental groups in Washington.

Some of the federal commission's proposals are likely to arouse controversy. It recommends, for example, that federal investment in ocean and coastal research be at least doubled during the next five years from the estimated $650 million being spent annually today. Commission members suggested the money could come from an estimated $5 billion in annual oil-and-gas royalties on federal offshore leases, which now go largely into the general fund.

"Will there be a contest over that funding? You better believe it," said retired Admiral James D. Watkins, a veteran of past Republican administrations who was chairman of the 16-member U.S. panel.

Environmentalists who have criticized President Bush for policies they say have hurt natural ecosystems also say the report is just a beginning in what they would like to see the government undertake.

The commission is set to meet with lawmakers in the Senate and House today to present the report's findings. It is recommending, among other things, that Congress pass legislation giving the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration more authority to take actions that could include creating more marine sanctuaries.

Bush administration officials said they welcomed the report's findings. "There is agreement on both sides of the aisle that we need to do something to better understand this great resource called the ocean," said John "Jack" Kelly Jr., a retired Air Force brigadier general who serves as a deputy undersecretary at the Commerce Department.

To send us your comments, questions, and suggestions click here
The home page of this website is www.mindfully.org
Please see our Fair Use Notice